Sweden has provided another example, via The Croydonian:
"A municipality in eastern Sweden paid a biker gang 200,000 kronor to move away from the region."
The national government could have intervened and used state power to get rid of the biker gang but it wasn't necessary. The socially optimal (presuming that the municipalities leaders are properly representing their constituents) solution won out without outside legal intervention. The bikers didn't want to stay more than the locals wanted them gone. The locals made it worth their while to leave.
4 comments:
"It is always a temptation to an armed and agile nation,
To call upon a neighbour and to say:
“We invaded you last night – we are quite prepared to fight,
Unless you pay us cash to go away ..."
hmm not sure about this- this is a governmetn subsidy after all isn't it- so it depends on a legal system and governmetnal powers- it no more shows the unnecessity of government intervention than corn subsidies.
and what kind of country does this happen ( i presume they were unpopular becauwe they were engaging in illegal actitiy) ? perhpas we should rename danegeld........i wrote this and then saw lecrapaud's comment!
And I always though extortion was a bad thing.
Hello, i would like to know more about this topic because looks interesting and i need to find information to finish a college project.
Post a Comment