Sunday, October 05, 2008

The Department of Energy and Climate Change

While Peter Mandelson's reappointment is clearly the political story of the reshuffle I think the more interesting change, in policy terms, is the creation of the new Department of Energy and Climate Change (or DE&CC).  The dynamics of that department could play a huge role in how our energy policy develops over the coming years.

I think that the short term consequences are pretty clear.  This will bring administrative chaos and reduce the chances of urgent action to get Britain through the capacity crunch without the lights going out.  There is necessarily a lack of clarity following a change like this.  What priorities will the new boss have?  Who is responsible for what?  Where is my desk?

The Government have spent ten years in the belief that Britain can be securely powered by a combination of gas and renewables.  At this stage action needs to be taken quickly to reform policies that are leading us into dangerous over-reliance on a single fuel that is becoming increasingly difficult to source.  In the medium term (i.e. as soon as possible) we need new nuclear plants but right now we need new coal.  These are genuine tough decisions - the vague rhetoric we've had from the Government so far does not constitute a sufficient response.

It sounded like John Hutton was starting to understand the scale of the problem; that a senior politician was finally getting past the complacency Campbell Dunford has identified.  Now we have to hope that Ed Miliband will see the light as well and the chaos of the reorganisation won't delay something actually getting done for too long.

In the medium term it will be interesting to see which one of the department's two priorities wins out in the numerous situations where green policies - and financing the £100 billion bill - are not conducive to providing an affordable and secure energy supply.  The ex-DEFRA climate change bureaucracy is, I think, probably larger.  In that respect, it will have the advantage.  More bureaucrats means more people with their pet schemes to push, more staff who are really interested in climate change policy and find energy rather boring.

On the other hand, the reason why Ministers love working on climate change is that the outcomes are all decades and centuries in the future so there is no real accountability.  By contrast, people will notice if the lights go out.  While politicians can try and blame the energy companies, or hope they're in a different job by the time poor choices lead to economic disaster, there is a much greater chance that the public will notice when political leaders let them down in energy policy than with climate change.

We'll see how it all plays out.  Hopefully this week's announcement won't be another step on the road to serious power cuts.

6 comments:

Dave Cole said...

Rubbish.

People were attacking the previous set-up because it was split between DEFRA and BERR. Implementation sat with one and regulation with the other. If nothing else, it was not obvious who, at the Cabinet table, was responsible for energy. Now it's Ed Miliband (which presuambly means his brother has now become a Centiband).

I know you don't accept a lot of the arguments that suggest climate change is happening and is largely anthropogenic; fair enough. However, most people do. Given that governments are going to act on that basis and there is going to be top-level ministerial work on the issue, which is tied in closely to energy security and supply, it makes sense to have the two together.

As it happens, I agree with you on nuclear and gas. Although nuclear remains controversial, there is a decent amount of support for it in Government and in Parliament; you might recall that Trade & Industry select committee came out and said that nuclear was, at worst, low carbon.

xD.

viagra online said...

HI,
Nice and interesting information posted here ... Really awesome...
Thanks for posting

Anonymous said...

If you have been issued with a winding up petition for your company because the company owes money. You can pay the money owed before the court date and get the case droped or fight it if you believe it to be worth defending.

Forzest Online said...

It is a very informative and useful post thanks it is good material to read this post increases my knowledge.
Keep Sharing such a great things always!!

Anonymous said...

Wooden bookshelves are an ideal way to improve the style and interior design of your home. Whether you go for the archaic, antiquated look, or prefer the modern wooden style, a well-made wooden bookshelf will enhance the look of any room.
Wooden Bookshelves

Климатици Пловдив said...

Климатици Пловдив е специализирана в продажба монтаж и сервиз на климатична техника за пловдив и региона